<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No Carbon Tax Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nocarbontax.com.au</link>
	<description>No Carbon Tax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:46:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Julia Gillard: admits election deceit over Carbon Tax by BillR</title>
		<link>http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/2011/07/julia-gillard-admits-election-deceit-over-carbon-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>BillR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/?p=2456#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>The first thing you need to do is to read a dictionary definition of the word &quot;lie&quot;. It demands INTENT to deceive. As there is no provable INTENT, therefore you cannot truthfully say that she lied. Nor can you truthfully claim that she deceived, because her own words that you quote are after the election, not before. 

If the issue is that she claims she could have formed effective government without concessions to the Greens, then she was obviously mistaken, as their support was always necessary to get legislation through the senate, let alone the reps. You, like all your kind. make no credible case for your statement, and have no credible rebuttal of my argument. You are wrong, but incapable of seeing why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing you need to do is to read a dictionary definition of the word &#8220;lie&#8221;. It demands INTENT to deceive. As there is no provable INTENT, therefore you cannot truthfully say that she lied. Nor can you truthfully claim that she deceived, because her own words that you quote are after the election, not before. </p>
<p>If the issue is that she claims she could have formed effective government without concessions to the Greens, then she was obviously mistaken, as their support was always necessary to get legislation through the senate, let alone the reps. You, like all your kind. make no credible case for your statement, and have no credible rebuttal of my argument. You are wrong, but incapable of seeing why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SHAME, FOUR CORNERS, SHAME by web desining company</title>
		<link>http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/2011/09/shame-four-corners-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>web desining company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/?p=4404#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>Great sharing ..Nice information is presented with a lots of useful matters,,really so informative and expressive blog presented here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great sharing ..Nice information is presented with a lots of useful matters,,really so informative and expressive blog presented here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LABOR&#8217;S POISON PILLS IN THE CARBON TAX by web desining company</title>
		<link>http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/2011/09/a-clean-green-future-but-not-for-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>web desining company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/?p=4362#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>This blog explains well about its topic..We can get a nice information with a good thoughts shared here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog explains well about its topic..We can get a nice information with a good thoughts shared here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lord Monckton 2011 Tour and Rally Dates by Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/2011/06/lord-monckton-2011-tour-and-rally-dates/comment-page-3/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/?p=1938#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>For a comprehensive rebuttal of many of Christopher Monckton&#039;s arguments, check out the presentation by Professor John Abraham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a comprehensive rebuttal of many of Christopher Monckton&#8217;s arguments, check out the presentation by Professor John Abraham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Injecting Carbon Tax by ad</title>
		<link>http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/2011/11/5174/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nocarbontax.com.au/?p=5174#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>Global warming is a scam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is a scam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

