Norwegian mass murderer has only the Climate Alarmist ’1010 Campaign’ video, showing sceptic children being blown up, on which to model himself, not the conservative and climate sceptic movements. [...]
|
|
|||
In a recent post we discussed how much little of the Climate Change argument is actually science. But what is the core science, and where will this science lead us? Let us ask our government’s Climate Change Science Commissioner, Tim Flannery – the expert employed to represent to us this government’s version of climate [...] 
Joanne Nova needs no introduction as the brains behind Australian’s leading Climate Sceptic website www.joannenova.com.au. Joanne presents a lively introduction to the crazy world of climate pseudoscience that has something for everyone: [...] 
How much of the ‘climate change science’ we must accept is actually science? When IPCC chooses only CO2 reduction as the action on climate, when Labor / Green parties exclude Nuclear and Hydro, when Garnaut picks a specific mechanism of a Carbon Tax to reduce CO2 or when David Karoly calls for closure of one specific business, Hazelwood, is all that ‘science’ which we must accept? [...] 
Australian physicist Professor Brian J O’Brien was closely involved in the Apollo 11 moon mission. He is interviewed by ABC’s Richard Fidler: Prof O’Brian is a breath of fresh air from an era when science was about the science, environmentalism was about the protecting the environment and getting it wrong had consequences. [...] 
Not long ago, the United Nations leadership under the Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon, held a secret conference [1] to discuss ways to destroy national sovereignty and independence, turning the UN into an unelected world government. Those who attended the conference agreed among themselves that national identity and distinctiveness were a barrier to orderly government of the planet. They plotted what, in UK law at any rate, [...] 
David Evans, a mathematician and electrical engineer with 6 university degrees and ex carbon modeller and alarmist explains elegantly the science of climate models, carbon dioxide and climate sensitivity.
Thanks to Beckeroo.
One dad’s answers to a school project: Interview Dad on Carbon Tax:
Q1: What are the advantages and disadvantages of a Carbon Tax being introduced in Australia? There are no advantages because it will cost too much and not improve the environment, even if everyone in the world spent all the money they had saved up doing it. Carbon dioxide gas warms the planet a little bit but is not as dangerous to the climate as scientists though it was. Climate changes mainly due to natural causes like the sun and the oceans, not due to you and me and the climate will not get too hot anytime soon. Clever kids like you will have plenty of time to invent exciting and better ways of making our planet an even nicer home for more people and look after the environment, as children before you have always done since the Romans invented the flushing toilet. Right now, there are many more important and urgent things to fix, like paying back too much borrowed money by many naughty countries, helping with famine in Africa, providing clean water to poor countries and fixing up mean governments around the world. There are many disadvantages. It will cost more for Australian businesses to make things compared to other countries, so all of Australia will become poorer. Families will end up paying even more for heating, cooking, all their food and most things they buy (even with some of the money being returned by the government). Too much of our money will be wasted on people doing silly jobs, and on expensive machines that don’t work well and on people cheating, all for no benefit as has already happened in Europe. Think, how do we heat your bedroom at night, when we close coal power stations and expensive solar panels have no sunlight and wind turbines have no wind. Over two years ago, with Rudd’s CPRS (Carbon Trading) looming, I had dinner with a top banking executive, wearing one of our Climate Sceptic polo shirts. After a while, when he didn’t mention my polo shirt, I asked about carbon trading. Will it cause a bubble? ‘Yes” Will it burst? “Yes” [...]
[Just noticed... 'Witch' in the title is not intended to refer to anyone, it's just a pun on the song from Wizard of Oz) Finally, peer reviewed science which disputes climate alarm finally hits the front pages of main stream media. The climate catastrophe of inundation by rising sea levels is now dead And along with it, the whole climate scam and Carbon Taxing. To continue the faith, Alarmists now must start publicly denying that peer reviewed observational evidence is falsifying their previous peer reviewed research, which, by the way, is mostly based on computer climate modelling. Observation trumps models…always. The Australian correctly affords front page significance to a second peer reviewed paper, disputing the Climate Alarm over projected sea level rise by IPCC, which is one of the main justifications for Julia Gillard’s deceitful Carbon Tax: The Australian: Sea-level rises are slowing, tidal gauge records show. |
Click on banner above to get "No Carbon Tax" T-shirts, caps & bumper stickers 
Supporters:
Stage and sound equipment providers for the Rallies
|
||
|
Copyright © 2012 No Carbon Tax Website - All Rights Reserved
|
|||
